Time-lines here are crucial. Indeed, if you look back over the history of the diplomatic battles with Iran, timelines seem to be almost infinitely flexible’.
FOR DAYS NOW there has been talk of a military strike against Iran’s nuclear capability. The Israeli press have been dominated by the possibility, made credible by the presence of a senior British military officer in Israel, and the appearance of Ehud Barak, the Israeli defence minister, in London; as well as an anti-Iranian public statement by the UK.
But the most convincing clue as to the West’s intension comes with the release of a report by the UN’s nuclear watchdog – the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is expected to confirm the intension of Iran to produce a nuclear weapon. It will suggest that Iran is now on the brink of such a development.
What this means is, is that diplomacy has proved useless and further sanctions will prove equally so. The president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has taken all of this talk seriously and issued bellicose statements defying Israel, America and Britain to do their worst, promising, in return, an overwhelming military response against Israel.
There is no doubt in my mind that Iran is endeavouring to create a nuclear capability in a part of the world where such a weapon’s omnipotence would be respected, if the West’s suspicions and intelligent guesses proved accurate.
If Iran can successfully threaten and chastise her Western enemies and create doubt and fear among their leaders to such an extent that they are left fighting among themselves over what action to take in response to this new Iranian power, then Iran will continue to gain the increasing respect from the Arab Muslim world. But not only this, she will also reach further afield and gain the respect and support among all of those Muslim peoples who blame the West for all of their misfortunes, including droughts and monsoons.
Ahmadinejad sees the West as the late Chairman Mao saw the West. He believes the West are paper tigers roaring endlessly but doing nothing; only posturing and threatening him with sanctions. By using rhetoric as the only source of threat against him, the Iranian president feels personally, as he should, as omnipotent as he feels his ownership of a nuclear capability makes his nation.
To have allowed such a devastating military capability to be created, and then for it to be placed in the deadly hands of religious fanatics headed by Iran’s Mullahs; and to have done so without any challenge apart from empty rhetorical threats and various sanctions; the dubious success of which, those imposing them are all too well aware.
IF ISRAEL IS FORCED TO go it alone in order to protect her people from the nightmare of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s hand on the nuclear button; then, through sheer necessity, the Jewish state will have to go it alone. Ahmadinejad has let his feelings toward Israel be known on an almost daily basis. He, like Hamas, wishes the state of Israel not to exist; and he would not hesitate to destroy the Jewish state had he the means to do so. Now it seems, that if the leeks about the contents of the IAEA report are true; he does have, or is soon to have, such a means.
We in the West have passed resolution after resolution and issued warning after warning, throughout Iran’s journey toward nuclear statehood. Iran rightly judged that the West would do nothing of any practical effect to deter her in her ambition. Indeed, the West even reigned in Israel when she hoped to halt Iran’s ambitions in their tracks, as she had done when Syria tried to become a nuclear power.
The West has allowed an unstable leadership of theologians in Iran to develop the ultimate military weapon with only a pointed finger waved in response.
Iran’s ambitions should have been nipped in the bud before a time was reached when Iran had a responsive capability. The West, but most notably America’s leaders, have badly let their country’s closest ally down. Prevarication became an art form among Western leaders when it came to Iran; so much so that we are living with a far greater threat now than we had much earlier, when we could have sent five or six jets to bomb what would have been a project in its infancy.
IRAN NEEDS TO BE STOPPED. But it should be a Western coalition preferably without any direct Israeli involvement that does the deed. The days of prevarication are coming to an end as far as the West and Iran are concerned. Israel would, as she did at the time of the first Iraq War, stand to one side and allow her allies to do what is needed in all of our interests. If Israel has to go it alone then the aftermath for the West will be traumatic. Not only the Arab world but the Islamic world as a whole will be up in arms: and whatever terrorist threat we may have now, will be nothing compared to what will follow a successful Israeli raid on Iran’s nuclear capability.
No comments:
Post a Comment