Monday, April 1, 2013

The supremacy of the minority


ALL MINORITIES have become privileged people in our liberal society. They are listened to most assiduously, and there complaints, which usually take the form of a campaign resulting in, shall we say street activity involving lighted candles; are all treated preferentially by our politicians. Whether gay, bisexual, black, brown, transgender, or members of the travelling community as well as, no doubt, in the future, paedophiles: all such minorities will be able to command the ear of  politicians and the liberal media.
            
              They now take precedence over the White Heterosexual British (WHB). In our town halls and throughout the country taxpayers money is being dispersed like oversees aid to these ‘special’ groups. Resentment is rife at the way the WHB taxes are being spent, as well as the way their concerns are ignored in preference to those of whatever politically correct minority is seeking what they regard as their entitlements. Those in authority over us (particularly in the town halls) have been well schooled into accepting multiculturalism and diversity. They treat any member of any minority with such keenness as if they had discovered a cure for all cancers.
            
              The Gay community for instance are like irascible children being dragged around a supermarket by their mothers demanding everything that takes their eye on the shelves; and if refused, they fall to the floor kicking and screaming. The Gays demand to be allowed to marry; so the politicians, many of whom are themselves are gay, kow-tow to what we are told is as their human right. Then gays demand the right to foster children – so enter Elton John to promote such an activity.
            
             Racism in football is being targeted. Racism is ugly and should be ignored by footballers if it amounts to verbal abuse. If it amounts to a physical threat then the criminal law is there to act, and should do so. But name calling of a racial nature has been made illegal; another privilege aimed at servicing minorities.
            
            On the football pitch when, has as happened recently, a black player has been  racially abused by another player, and the player accused is sent to the benches for two or three games -  then what power does this give to some chippy black player? Or more likely, a black player who wants nothing more than to gain an advantage in a game for his team. If professional footballers can dive theatrically; then such players can use their colour to achieve the same advantage for their team in a match.
            
            This is the consequence of outlawing ‘racism’ in football. It hands power to the black player and breeds fear into the authorities. Racism in football can only be ended by the passing of the generations, not by the FA or any other administrative body covering football worldwide .

AS FAR AS ANOTHER minority community is concerned; I believe even the liberals are losing patience with them. The so-called travelling community, who lay claim to land that they have no legal entitlement to own, but because of the tortuous legalities involved, they sit tight in claiming it as their own.
            
            First of all travellers are not gypsies; they are Irish vagabonds (called travellers) who have managed to accumulate wealth because of our liberal tolerance of their life-style, including until recently, the profitable use of slavery, targeting the homeless and imprisoning them, while using them as slave labour to help tarmac driveways.
            
            Many of these Irish travellers own countless properties in the Irish Republic; bought by their flouting of the law in the UK supported by the liberalarte throughout the liberal media including the BBC and the Guardian.
            
ANOTHER MINORITY  living among us are the Pakistani community – Muslims all. They are over two million strong and living as citizens of the UK. They represent the Muslim majority in this country. They have numerous, what we WHBs would describe as quangos, overseeing the welfare of their Pakistani communities and are welcomed onto, particularly the BBC, whenever an Islamic issue arises.
           
              In Syria today it is being claimed that 100 British Muslims are supporting the Syrian opposition, an admittedly minute assemblance, but upon their return to British soil could cause MI5 a great deal of worry if they return as Islamists. This is the worry that haunts our politicians. They, because of our country’s Islamic population are left fearful and constrained. Which is why our politician’s tied the hands of our soldiers in Afghanistan.
            
              Most of  the WHB are feeling excluded and have been forced to keep their mouths shut for fear of committing a hate crime. When children in Rochdale are kidnapped and abused by a gang of Pakistani men, the police are afraid to act; when there are honour killings, female circumcision and children brutally exorcised of ‘evil spirits’; the WHBs remain silent, as they have always had to, for fear of charges of racism, homophobia, etcetera.
            
              We as a country are going to go through very difficult and frightening economic times. Inter culture antagonism will grow as the housing shortage and pupil overflow in our schools grows, and the welfare state takes a hit. The NHS will face becoming a second rate service struggling to cater for a population which has been grown artificially by the previous government, hoping to bring the worst out of the Tories whom they perceived as pathologically racist.
           
              I can honestly say that, believing what I see as the kind of future this nation faces, I would not want to be born into it. Our children and grandchildren have been badly let down by my generation in particular – the so-called, want it all now, baby-boomers.
            
              But also by the ideology which was part of the baggage of that has been passed down through the generations since. This  liberal consensus set about changing the country and its institutions. It captured academia and all that flowed from it…tributaries of comprehensive schools, a loathing of the Grammar schools, and a hatred of private education. The left also seized control of another once great institution – the BBC. But it’s grip on every aspect of our system of education was a coup ďétat. For was it not the Jesuits who said, give me a child of seven, and I will give you a catholic for life.

EVENTUALLY, through the control of education; over generations the liberal culture, like a virus, achieved a hegemony over our nation’s culture; and sought about diminishing it. A liberal hegemony that gave birth to multiculturalism, and eventually the opening up of the floodgates to migration from all four corners of the compass.
            
            We, the majority of WHBs, have had to sit on the sidelines since the 1960s, our mouths tightly shut and frightened of being compared to Enoch Powell by the Left. A comparison, which, like that of being witches in the 17th century, was enough to keep ones mouth tightly zipped.
            
            But today Powell’s name is about to become part of a British Renaissance. He understood that cultures as diverse, as, for instance , the Hindu and Muslim cultures in India; they could never tolerate each other; and so it proved with the exodus of the Muslims from India, after hundreds of thousands of deaths on all sides. Thus East and West Pakistan emerged: followed by internal strife between Muslims; and Bangladesh was created.
            
             In today’s Muslim world Shia and Sunni Muslims are at each other’s throats. The only thing that seems to unite them is their loathing of the West and Christianity in particular; which is being persecuted throughout the Muslim world today with little apparent interest taken by the liberal media in this country.
            
            Minorities are minorities because they cannot live together. Their cultures are so diverse to be tolerated because they have entrenched cultural positions, cemented in their DNA over millennia. They can however tolerate each other through a kind of apartheid. They can have residency apart within different city districts. Districts like China Town, Golders Green, Seven Seas Road, Earl’s Court. Such names suggest areas of minority occupancy – including Chinese, Jewish, Irish, and Australian.
              
            But multiculturalism was not meant to be about apartheid, but integration. I do not know whether to pity or hate those liberal evangelists of multiculturalism who sought, on the one hand to allow diversity of different cultures, yet expect them to live together . What multiculturalism does is set cultures apart. The majority of WHBs only want their nation back. These islands have been our home for millennia. Neither the Romans, Saxons, the Viking raiders, or the Normans entered these isle without a fight. Yet today’s boarder agency is armed with only a rubber stamp and indifference to the threat to their nation.
            
            In a multicultural society the minorities have the upper hand and reign supreme over the indigenous peoples of these isles because of a liberal hegemony. The minorities sway is supreme and it still goes unchallenged through fear of the dreaded hate crime.

OUR RACIAL MINORITIES should adapt to the monoculture of the United Kingdom. They should not be allowed to introduce their culture as equal to it. But this is what liberal multiculturalism has set in train; a measure that goes against the beliefs of the majority of the British people; but because of liberal arrogance, has been allowed to proceed. This liberal arrogance is part and parcel of all the three main parties, and it is to them that the decline of the UK will be attributed to by history.


           

           
             

No comments: