IT IS NOT A JUST WORLD. If it were, the Labour Party
would never be elected again until this generation of its politicians had been
replaced. The whole process should take just over a decade to accomplish; then
hopefully, the Labour Party will be fit once more to govern this country.
Politicians
by their nature have to be a thick skinned lot in order to survive the jungle
they have thrown themselves into. But the likes of Milliband, Balls, and all of
those who served in government between 1997 and 2010, must either have elephant
hides, or despise the people they expect to vote for them - and they do.
Especially those unquestioning life time believers who would vote for a stick
of Brighton Rock, if it had Labour running through it.
Over
a 13 year period of governance, the Labour Party ruined the country
economically and, out of pure political vindictiveness[1]
opened the floodgates to immigration, with little or no thought as to its cost
to their much renowned health service, education system, or housing policy.
This piece of wickedness alone should have sent them into the wilderness; but
there was more to follow.
An
even more pernicious form of social engineering appeared - because, unlike
Blair's ill-considered attempt with immigration, Multiculturalism and its
appendage in the form political correctness, and the consequent flowering of
the hate crime, required much thought and planning.
Multiculturalism's
origins[2]
have little to do with New Labour, but New Labour implemented it with rigour
having allowed an open door policy to migration. Migration became the seed corn
of Multiculturalism. Multiculturalism was the perfect vehicle for seeing come
to fruition what the vast majority of the indigenous population rightly set
themselves against - the destruction of their indigenous British culture.
ONCE MORE THE Labour Party are gathering in Brighton
for their yearly conference; and Milliband, Balls, and the whole of the shadow
cabinet seem to perceive the British public as they would a school of goldfish
swimming endlessly around a pond handicapped
by their three minute memories. Which no doubt, is why they have the front to stand
beaming in front of the cameras. It is as if their recent past was another
country where things were done differently,
and little remembered.
The
Left, whether Labour or the Liberal Democrats are addicted. Their addiction is
not for alcohol, A or B class drugs, gambling, smoking, or sugar baring
confections. No, the Left are addicted to taxes, spending, borrowing, and
printing; the latter when all the former activity runs into the buffers.
This
week in Brighton will be no different to any other Labour conference. Spending
on childcare and promises by Ed Ball's that all their manifesto spending
pledges will come under the scrutiny of the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR). On the surface a neat move. But it now appears that it would be illegal
for the OBR to cost any party's election manifesto - quite right to.
It is interesting that such a manoeuvre[3] was
deployed: for it proves that the Labour Party are as distrusted on the economy
by the British people as would be a recovering gambler if insanely given the
levers within the Treasury. The OBR was never intended to cost any political
parties manifesto pledges; for to do so would invite criticism and challenge
the OBR's existence as an impartial analyst. If they granted Ed Balls his wish
and gave its approval to his manifesto costing; the OBR as part of the civil
service, would only invite its own demise and replacement.
Balls
is desperate that Labour should be considered at least competent in economic
matters by the British public; and his attempt at sequestrating the
independence of the OBR on behalf of the Labour Party is part of his desperate
strategy - 'it's the economy stupid' is engraved on Milliband and Ball's heart,
as it was on Bill Clinton's.
THE LABOUR PARTY does not deserve to be allowed anywhere
near the seat of government. The party has done irreparable damage to the
nation; and a simple apology by Ed Miliband is inadequate compensation for the irretrievable
damage the Labour Party as done to this country. I only wish that those
supporters of Labour who represent their core vote would come to their senses
and realise what the party they put their faith in, has done for the indigenous
working class people who they support.
The
halfway house between the Tories and Labour is Ukip; they are hated by the
Tories, so such Labour voters need fear not voting for them. The traditional working
class Labour voter is as patriotic as the traditional Tory voter, and each
should put their traditional party loyalties to one side and vote Ukip.
Labour
needs a period of reflection and recovery in opposition: while the
Conservatives need a return to Conservatism. Both Labour and the Tories need
taking down a peg. At the moment they both represent social democracy, the
political ideology that governs throughout Europe.
[1] It
was Labour's intention to get one over on the Tories, whose lack of opposition
was guaranteed, for fear of being called
racist. Labour also, with the decline of
their white working class vote, hoped that migrants would see things their way
come an election.
[2] I
read that one of its founding fathers was Roy Jenkins; who I believe later
recanted.
[3]
Intended, no doubt, to get the Labour
Party through their conference without the press leaning to heavily upon them
about their spending commitments.
No comments:
Post a Comment