SURELY THE DAYS of the television licence fee are
ending. This multi-billion pound tax-funded corporation cannot continue with such
a harvesting of the peoples taxes. The corporation is politically biased and it
no longer pretends not to be - the evidence is now overwhelming. It has an
inbuilt liberal bias at all levels and in all of its corridors. Those working
and running the BBC ignore the fact that over half the country does not share
its liberal bias, which is a London phenomenon among engaged upon by the
capitals political elites and commentariet which of course includes the BBC.
Nevertheless,
those of us social conservatives, are still made to pay the licence fee and because
we are law abiding we do so… if under protest. Last Thursday in my home town of
Great Yarmouth, Ukip returned ten councillors and garnered 6,835 votes in the
process: if (and it is a big if) each paid the licence
fee, it would bring £994,492 per year to the BBC - A large part of Jeremy Paxman's salary, in
fact.
Yet,
during the local election campaign several BBC producers and editors took to
their twitter accounts to attack Ukip. First up is Mimi Kempton-Stewart,
Political Editor for the Today programme, and one time Guardian student
media digital journalist of the year, who tweeted the following comments:
"UKIP are awful, really terrible, I can't wait until
this darned election is over so we can all be rid of them on our
screens/airwaves!—"
"Honestly,
if every UKIP voter were just to disappear
forever or die, the world would be a happier place. That's my view,
anyway.— "
"To
me the word "UKIP" sounds like a dog being sick. Like their policies!
Anyway, I'm off back to work, at my job at the BBC.—
Mimi Kempton-Stewa"
Mimi Kempton-Stewa"
"and I didn't say they *should* die, I just said it'd
be nice if they did, working for the
BBC doesn't mean I can't have views— "
Can this woman hold onto any position in an
institution that professes to be unbiased? And what of those she hoped would
like to see us "disappear forever or die"? Are we still expected
to have to buy a television licence after such nasty and bias remarks from such
biased broadcasting outlet?
Meanwhile, Jasmine Lawrence, editor
of BBC's rolling news, attempted to ambush Ukip's #WhyImVotingUkip on twitter to say she was
voting Ukip because the party stood up
for "White, middle class, middle
aged men with sexist/racist views[who are] totally underrepresented in politics
today." Ms Lawrence, living as she does in the London political
bubble, cannot appreciate the irony of her comment "…totally underrepresented in politics today". Her
political horizon is very limited indeed; as today's European election results
will show. She is also profoundly ignorant in the targeting of her abuse. I am
indeed white (which is, it appears, only a problem in parts of multicultural
London); I am also a man (yet another fault apparently) and Ms Lawrence's
misandry only serves to identify her as the source of much of Ukip's advances
in the country.
I am not middle class, and have no
sexist or racist views. Although I would no doubt not fail to meet Ms
Lawrence's exacting standards with regard to being either sexist or racist… the
imprint of the puritan zealot has always demanded more exacting standards after
all.
Then we have Radio 4's Rosemary Baker tweeting "I am SO sick of hearing Nigel Farage & associated UKIP
lunatics on BBCr4today. Absolutely done to death & feels like skewing ed
pol" - May 21, 2014. Now it appears I and the many thousands of other Ukip
voters are "lunatics". If there is any truth in that, then it would
not be because of our views, but because we continue to pay a licence tax and
do not refuse to do so.
Is there any significance in the
fact that these troll-like twitters are all written by women? Their behaviour
undermines the central tenet of liberalism which is tolerance. Something us
Ukip voters are accused daily of lacking. These women live and work in the
liberal comfort zones of the BBC and among the London Metropolitan elite.
Ukip has dared challenge and
undermine their liberal certainties among which are the EU, multiculturalism;
and the three party liberal axis that operates our national parliament and
governs our country. The BBC and the Houses of Parliament are the Two Towers of
liberalism radiating their certainties (including their intolerance) throughout
the nation - I will not take the analogy any further and describe London as
Mordor because it would not be true. It is only in such London areas as Primrose
Hill, Notting Hill, Islington, and Hampstead, where the liberal tea party operate;
that diminishes a fine city.
It is not racist to deliver a fact. London
is a multicultural city where the indigenous white population have dug up their
roots and left. In the first instance to the new towns in Essex constructed
from the 1960s onward; and the migration has continued ever since, until the
white indigenous London population will, in the coming decade, themselves
become an ethnic minority.
It has always been the case that
immigrants have been, from their first arrival in the 1950s, and right through
the following generations; have, in the main, always supported the Labour
Party; and this support continues, and the influx has replaced the white working
class as their main focus of support.
Tony Blair understood this, which is
why he ignored the seven-year breathing space provided by the Schengen
Agreement, and allowed Polish migration to begin prematurely in 2008 - although
it has been said that he was pussy-whipped by his wife into allowing it because
she was a Catholic, as are the majority of Poles; and would therefore increase
the Catholic population to the advantage of Rome and disadvantage of the of the
Anglican Church[1]
- but who any longer cares about that pitiful institution?
THESE
BBC personages who use the etiquette and language of trolls in their tweets,
have done those of us who have long believed in the reality of political bias
at the BBC, a great service in strengthening our position - although it did not
need it.
The licence fee should be abandoned.
If this wretched broadcaster is as popular as it professes and it believes
itself to be doubly so internationally; then they will have no problem
surviving with their own devices in the broadcasting market place. No
broadcaster should be dependent on the taxpayer (e.g. the state) for its
survival. The state in a democracy has no role to play as far as broadcasting
is concerned; it is only a player in a state controlled society, like the
Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and today in such places as Cuba and throughout
many parts of the Muslim world.
IT
IS TIME FOR THE BBC to depart, and be weaned from their dependence on the
taxpayer; like an addict off cocaine. If they are so convinced by their
self-importance that they believe themselves superior to Murdock's Sky and Fox;
and see themselves as broadcasting royalty, as it appears they have always
done: then the BBC should have no trouble surviving alone in the market place.
One thing is for sure, this
broadcasting institution cannot continue as a publicly financed body. That
affectionate and comforting BBC pseudonym "Auntie" that saw the
broadcaster, through the 1970s and 80's; was then, and still is, a loveable
pastiche. But the love in whatever form, is sinking away. The BBC today is as it
has always been ever since Lord Reith began the corporations ascendancy - deeply
biased. In Reith's time the establishment bias was Conservative; and the public
approved, as in the main they were all small 'c' conservatives, including
Labour working class supporters; and believed in traditional values. The same
values Reith brought to the BBC were therefore supported by the vast majority
of the population.
The advance since the 1960s of the London
centred liberal hegemony, has spelt the ruination of the BBC as far as taxation
for its upkeep is concerned. Those of us small 'c' conservatives are no longer
supportive of the BBC. We do not subscribe to its liberal agenda and should be
given the opportunity to watch television without the need to finance opinions
we do not agree with - does this sound like democracy?
The BBC must go it alone in the free
market and find its own niche; thus saving the taxpayer over £3 billion a year.
Those who wish to subscribe will be free to do so. But let the rest of us still
be allowed to watch a television set without fear of prosecution. To this
extent the BBC are no better in their methods than Putin in his.
The BBC are tax collectors who can
send people to prison if they refuse payment. It is true that the government
are seeking to disband the ultimate penalty of prison for none payment
replacing it with a fine. But what happens if the fine goes unpaid? Does prison
still remain an option? If not, what is the purpose of any such penalty?
It is a cruel irony that such a
modern liberal construct as the BBC should rely upon imprisonment as a penalty
for the none payment of the licence tax. In fact it contradicts its whole
liberal ethos of tolerance. Yet the corporation illiberally pursues those who
stop payment of the license fee. You can murder someone and receive 15 years
and be paroled after seven or less years; but the none payment of the licence
fee can be measured as some kind of a liberal equivalent to the use of the word
Nigger as far as the BBC are concerned.
THE
BBC is no longer the broad small 'c' conservative church it once was. Its
social liberal values are out of step with much of the country; and it is an
egregious affront to the majority of us who are forced to pay for its services.
We are still a small 'c'
conservative nation and long may we remain so - but as an institution the BBC
is not and has never been since the 1960's; yet they demand, like the fabled
Sheriff of Nottingham, their blanket tribute from the people on penalty of
imprisonment or the sequestration of private property - which, after all, the
Left have never been bothered about.
It is time for a campaign of
none-payment of the licence fee to begin. Many of those who support the BBC
believe it cannot continue in its current form. It recruits almost wholly from
the pages of Guardian, at almost
every level; and serves its agenda. Which would be fine if it operated in the
free market. But the BBC has lost its emotional bond with more and more of the
British people. It is time for dear old Auntie to euthanised and reincarnated
into a privately funded broadcaster.
[1]
Let me say that I have been an atheist for the greater part of my life; so I
have no axe to grind.
No comments:
Post a Comment