Racism be dammed

I KNOW I AM NOT A RACIST; but if called one by a liberal, I would wear the title with pride. If I had said what Michael Fallon, and now David Blunkett have said regarding their description of parts of the country being 'swamped' with immigrants, I would have been called racist, by even the most moderate of liberals: but on Sky's press preview last night, a young lady whose name happily escapes me, but who is a journalist on the Observer, suggested that Mr Fallon's reference to being 'swamped' was considered by her to be 'borderline racism'.

            

            If I had used the same language as Fallon, I would not be given the liberal soubriquet 'borderline' – but just an out and out racist; and bigot added for seasoning. So let us put it to the test. There are parts of the country being swamped by specifically, but not exclusively, European immigrants. The London elite live in a multicultural nirvana where, within their terms of a modest income, they can provide for themselves cheap servants (thanks to migration)  for the likes of the lady from the Observer, from Eastern European nations. They live cocooned lives from the rest of the country, and drop crumbs from the table of their liberal morality for the rest of us to accept on penalty of being exposed as racist.

            

            Night after night, day after day, week after week, and month after month: we who live outside the twilight zone of metropolitan London, have to live with a political agenda set in their terms, with their spin, and their own liberal prejudices … oh yes, liberals have prejudices too.

            

             London has deemed itself the capital of the nation's media, culture, politics, journalism, and multiculturalism; and as such sets what they believe to be the authentic voice of progressive politics and tolerance, that spew forth such terms as racist and bigot to the rest of the country if they violate the language of political correctness, and choose to express themselves in such a way that they deem as unfit to use.

             

             The decadent purveyors and architects of the liberal hegemony, are anchored primarily in London, from where they expect the rest of the country to kowtow to their 'progressive' standards of behaviour under penalty of the law… laws comprising the hate crime.

            

             Hate has been outlawed…an emotion as old as homo sapiens, and an intrinsic part of human nature, has now been made illegal in certain politically correct circumstances. We of course all hate, including those who legislated for such a facile addition to this country's legislatory system.

            

             But the law is now to be confined to liberal prejudices and restrictions. We must not hate any minority for instance. We can legally and freely hate David Cameron, Ed Milliband and Nick Clegg, and give expression to it, unless it of course carries a threat. But to hate someone from another culture who lives among us if we express such a hate in terms of language used; is now a violation of free speech.

            

             The terms nigger and Paki, for instance, cannot be used unless protected by a series of asterisks. To use such terms openly and freely constitutes a hate crime; unless, that is, the word nigger is used by a black man against another black 'bro'.

I LIVE IN one of the areas referred to by Michael Fallon. I live on the east coast and have seen many unwelcome changes to my town's demographic. I am 64, and as a lifelong supporter and voter  for of the Labour Party, but now a Ukip voter; I welcome both Michael Fallon's and David Blunkett's comments. They are both giving vent to the feelings of many millions of indigenous UK citizens that have been ignored by the liberalista from within all the main parties. We have been treated like rosette warring chimpanzees of whatever political colour, who's  politicians have been led to believe they can expect to be guaranteed our vote  -  in my case Labour; who have been told, the party could always rely upon their core vote, just as the Conservatives could have once relied upon their core vote.

            It is now time for this core vote within all the three main parties, to fragment. The core voters have been taken for granted by professional politicians for far too long. It is the core vote that has helped create the professional politician. These core votes are based primarily upon sentiment rather than intellect - the sentiment of family tradition; and this is particularly strong in Labour's case.

IMMIGRATION is out of hand. It has reached a point where we have added to our population some five million people since Tony Blair opened the floodgates to uncontrolled EU migration. Its impact on the NHS, welfare, schools and housing has proven detrimental to the indigenous population. Overpopulation caused by unlimited immigration has, and continues, to take its toll on the  NHS and other social services.

            

            Racism has nothing to do with what this country is facing; although there may be racists involved in seeking to divert through whatever means they think they can hope to advance the racist cause. But Ukip is no such party. If it was, I would not give it my support.

           

             Immigration has reached unacceptable lengths and depths within our society. Its growth is dangerous to our nation's social fabric. Over population incurred by opening the floodgates to millions of people in so short a time leaves society with the inability to accommodate it. In the UK, our social fabric is under the assault from the free movement of people's directive conjured up by the EU. We are now left not only facing up to the demise of the NHS, because of the free movement of peoples; but we are also not facing up to the demise of our education system due to the free movement of peoples. We are also now left not facing up to the housing shortage and increased prices due to the free movement of peoples.

            

             Under such conditions for the liberalista to insinuate racism ,borderline or not, to the likes of Fallon and Blunkett for speaking bluntly enough to fall foul of their London based hegemony; both Fallon and Blunkett should have treated them with two fingers pointed upwards in contemptible salutation .