UKIP HAVE GAINED ANOTHER MP at the Tories expense in
Rochester and Strood: and now comes next May's general election - and no one
knows what the makeup of the next parliament will be in terms of the occupancy of
the green benches. Commentators, various scribblers, and the party alchemists …
none of whom have any idea what the governance of this country will look like
come the 8th May next year, are still calling the shots.
Will
Ukip have sufficient MPs to have an influence on the governance of the country?
Will Labour, as the polls in Scotland predict after its referendum lose a
potential 42 Scottish seats to the SNP? Both
the main parties are currently polling in the low thirties. They are at their
core vote level of support (apart from the poor old Lib Dems who are just
fading away) …in other words the two main parties are at the rosette wearing
chimpanzee level; where if any of the three main party leaders were to
assassinate the Queen, they would still retain their core vote.
But
even here, because of the impact of Ukip; the core vote within the two main
parties is becoming more pliable and less rigid to the overtures of Ukip; and
this should concern the party leaders. No longer can the likes of Milliband and
Cameron take their core voters for granted. In Cameron's case, he has already
driven many of them into the arms of Ukip, through insulting and despising them
as ancients who he believes represent Old conservatism, in the Blairite sense[1] -
swivelled eye loonies who the Conservative party are better off without.
In
Miliband's case; his core vote still comprises a few million (if no longer in
the many millions) of the traditional working class; whose parents and grandparents
voted Labour and their progeny have continued on with the family tradition –
and have been taken for granted by the party; and are still being considered
part of the chimpanzee vote by the Red Ed Labour party as they were under Tony
Blair. The Labour Party hierarchy now comprises of, and has become the primary architects
of ,the liberal Metropolitan elite. Their horizon encompasses less and less the
traditional white working class, and more the interests of multiculturalism.
Multicultural
London is their new, post-socialist utopia, which they see as an example of
diversity at work and they want it for the rest of the country. Which is why they
sought the replacement of the white working class with the votes of second and
third generation immigrants from India and Pakistan. These are the modern
Labour Party's 'new' core voter to be won over, and its old core voters are
being used simply to make the transference.
Blair
tried to add to it by allowing millions of Poles and Portuguese to be,
prematurely, given free entry to this country. Immigrants were now Labour's new
'working class', and the sooner their old working class realises they are no
longer the Labour Party's patrons the better for themselves, as well as the Anglo-Caribbean
working class – each of whom share the same historical values.
IT IS AN EXCITING TIME in British politics. No
longer can the two main parties rely upon their traditional supporters. The
Tories, because they have ridiculed and have shown an arrogant attitude to
their party's traditional core vote; while the Labour Party has abandoned the
white working class who they see from their metropolitan sanctuary in London as
bigots, racists and being, at the very least, politically incorrect.
THE PEOPLE OF Rochester and Strood have voted, and
the Kippers have won; and I hope the Kippers will have a significant presence
and influence on this nation's history. For British parliamentary history,
thanks to Nigel Farage, is being invigorated and perhaps transformed, by
himself and his party's presence. Cameron would never even have considered any
kind of In/Out referendum on Europe if it had not been for the rise of Ukip and
Nigel Farage. Any questioning of immigration, or apology for its deluge under
Labour, by Labour, would not have been considered, if not for the advances by
Ukip into Labour territory.
The
fact that any reference to immigration which was once considered to be racist
by both Labour and the Cameron Tories (both part of the Leftist hegemony), has now,
thanks to the Kippers, been forced, through their electoral threat to the two
main parties, on to the political agenda – where, we all remember, any
reference to it was once considered racist by the very two parties that now
consider it open for discussion.
Ukip
has made its mark on the traditional comfort zone of political correctness. But throughout the
country beyond London, Nigel Farage represents to millions of people the voice
they never heard from their traditional party leaders. It took Farage and Ukip to
force the LabLibCon hegemony to sit up and listen. Cameron has offered us a
dubious In/Out referendum, something which when he came to power in 2010 would
never have entered his mind to ever adopt as a Europhile.
Even
the Labour party has been forced into making an apology for their lifting of
the floodgates to immigration. Any talk of immigration, once anathema to the
two main parties, has suddenly resonated within them because of Ukip and the
threat this party poses to their core vote
Only those on the liberal left such as the BBC, and the Guardian whose journalists such as Polly Toynbee, see Ukip as a racist party. These views are the real extremity of the current debate on immigration and Europe, and such views coalesce within the London liberal elite, whose auto de fe sets the standard for what is allowable to be spoken of in a once free society. The liberal auto de fe is among us, and has been among us since the 1960s. But only now, with the rise of multiculturalism, has the liberal auto de fe's despotism become dominant.
Only those on the liberal left such as the BBC, and the Guardian whose journalists such as Polly Toynbee, see Ukip as a racist party. These views are the real extremity of the current debate on immigration and Europe, and such views coalesce within the London liberal elite, whose auto de fe sets the standard for what is allowable to be spoken of in a once free society. The liberal auto de fe is among us, and has been among us since the 1960s. But only now, with the rise of multiculturalism, has the liberal auto de fe's despotism become dominant.
GOD BLESS THE KIPPERS. Nigel Farage liberated the voice of opposition to the EU, and this body's insistence that we have to let all and sundry from the rest of Europe to freely cross our borders; and by doing so our public services have been greatly undermined by the influx. This is probably the reason why Labour voters are deserting to Ukip, and may it long continue. The NHS is being wrecked by such an influx, housing is being undermined; and education placement is also being put under strain by the impact of immigration; either through the impact of free movement of European peoples or through immigration from without the EU, including Africa.
THE KIPPERS are here to stay whatever the outcome of the next general election. Nigel Farage has managed to massage the clitoris of the traditional Tory and working classes, whose innate patriotism they all share. This is the link between those traditional Tories and traditional Labour defectors who have joined Ukip.
Both the traditional working class and the traditional Tory supporter once shared the same social values, if not the political and economic ones. The traditional Labour working class always shared, even if not realising it, the same family values as the Tories. They may have deferred on political and economic issues. But when it came to the family and family values, the British working class, as a whole, shared the same impulses as the middle and ruling classes, and in this respect, all classes were alike until the rise of liberalism, that began at the start of the late 1950s and continued throughout the 1960s until today.
[1]
Cameron suckled at Blair's teat and tried to replicate his transformation of
the Labour Party by creating a similar one in the Tory Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment