The war against the Muslim world must become an accepted fact.

EGYPT ARE CARRYING out bombing raids on northern Libya after the IS beheaded 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians. The IS are expanding and recruiting as it advances toward its intended Islamist Caliphate. IS moved from Syria into Iraq, and now into Libya - at the same time  young Muslims are rallying to its cause throughout Europe; and Sunni Muslims are protecting IS in those areas under its authority (such Sunni civilians are not as innocent as the West would like its own citizens to believe - or wishfully think themselves into believing).

                

               Anyone with a nose for history must know at the very least, that something big is now afoot - even if the fog is yet to lift on what is actually occurring. We can however be forgiven for speculating. Those with a knowledge of the Crusades between 1095-1291; as well as the 16^th century European invasion by the Ottoman Turks under Suleiman, should be able to see a pattern emerging; if not in kind, then in ambition. IS has a mutual liking for their predecessors medieval forms of torture and blood-lust – now – here in  21^st century, IS uses beheading in the name of the Prophet – a form of execution that even the UK and France have long since done away with – which must say something.

                

               Yesterday 2,000 'Libyans' who had departed North Africa for our European shores made the comparatively short crossing of the Mediterranean. They were picked up by Italian coastguards and transported to safety in Italy. Such arrivals are threatening to swamp Europe: and how many among them may turn out to be IS sympathises planted to enact an atrocity in Europe? Sooner or later Italy will call for an amnesty, (if only because their sacrifices are not being taken seriously by the EU) which will give such arrivals under EU law automatic entry into every part of the European Union including of course the UK.

                

               We have in Europe a population of 15 million Muslims (Suleiman would have rejoiced at such a quantity before he attempted his assault on Europe). Two point five million of whom we have living among us in the UK. So let us look at the broader picture. IS are ruthless and capable of such a ruthlessness that terrifies Western politicians who want only to be popular and win elections; but also have to cater for ever larger Muslim constituents if they wish to succeed to political office.

WHAT DOES SUCH A  perspective conjure up? Very little it seems for our political class who prefer the nurturing approach toward Islam within a multicultural society. Islam is a genuine threat to the West. A threat the West sees only as an 'Islamist' threat. Meaning that in the UK and within European Islam, it is considered 99% on board with the UK and the West generally.               

                

                There is a decumbent mantra presented to us by our politicians and the Western media after a terrorist attack by members of the Muslim community that insists always that; 'The vast majority of Muslims living among us are peaceful and law abiding citizens'. This is the tune played out on such occasions, by our politicians who wish to pacify the white indigenous population whenever Islamists strike.

                It is all about the changing demographics. Muslim communities are reproducing, in percentage terms,  at a far higher rate of reproduction than are the indigenous white population comparatively speaking. This factor will eventually hand additional political power to the Islamic community within the cities of the UK where they are maximised – and give them a greater persuasive power on the political (in particularly Labour) parties that will eventually demand sharia law to sit beside English law, with the hope of one day replacing it – at least within their populated areas.

                And our politicians who wish to advance up the political mountain to greatness will  accommodate such an ambition, even if meant English law being replaced by religious law in many heavily populated areas of the country occupied by Muslims - so the problem is not only external but internal.

BUT GETTING BACK to the external nature of the IS threat: today's Daily Telegraph (18^th February) has the following headline on its web edition; " Islamic State 'planning to use Libya as gateway to Europe'".  According to the report the IS jihadists are using northern Libya as a possible entry point into Europe. Thousands of Muslims have made their way across the Mediterranean, in the full knowledge that if they make it to an Italian shore; they are virtually free to enter any other part of EU.

 

                Any generation other than the modern one would have turned such people away and returned them to North Africa. Modern Islam bears nothing but ill-will toward the West; yet the West does nothing to assail such an attitude; rather it seeks to appease it. The West is like ancient Troy, and the Muslim population that has been sieved  over decades to become citizens within Western culture, is the wooden horse that will eventually unleash Powell's river of blood.

 

                It is only the West's weakness that makes IS so powerful; just the same weakness has allowed 15 million Muslims to come and live among us in Europe through the guilt of empire torturing the minds of all European liberals; with little thought given to the social consequences on the indigenous cultures that have never been given any kind of consideration on whether such other cultures should be welcomed.

 

                Multiculturalism never faced any kind of public support through the ballot box at a general election; or through a referendum. Our political classes throughout Europe took it upon themselves to invite other cultures among the indigenous ones - and if the political classes were opposed? Well, then the clarion call of racism was heralded by liberal Europe to all those who resisted their intensions. So all opposition to Multiculturalism carried the black spot of racism.

 

EUROPE FACES an internal and external threat (a two-pronged attack that should never have been allowed to happen) from the Muslim world. Islam is a proselytising religion; but one which does not stop at recruitment through persuasion, but also through coercion and terrorism; and in extremis medieval barbarism - as we have seen practiced by IS. But before you think that IS is a kind of Frankensteinian creation unrepresentative of Islam. Then think back to 9/11 and al-Queada, believed to be behind the Twin Tower attacks in New York where 3,000 people died.

 

                We are at war with Islam because Islam is at war with us – we never threw down any gauntlet. But It has become a war the West must win if its values are to survive intact – values which Islam despises, even among those who the politicians and the media tells us are perfectly safe and supportive of democracy. Islam is a fossilised faith; attached to barbarism, and unable to comprehend (even in the 21^st century) any kind of rationality in their thinking; blinded as they are by their religious faith.

 

                The Christian faith was once no better in terms of torture and cruelty hundreds of years ago. But I place my emphasis on once. Today the Christian church has retreated to the other extreme within (especially, but not exclusively) Europe. Today the modern Christian Church, whether Catholic (under today's Pope) or Protestant have become as liberal as the continents politicians; and supports multi-faithism throughout the continent.

 

ISLAM IS THE MODERN THREAT to the West; and the longer we chose not accept it through a kind of liberal dementia, then the harder it will be to save democracy. Modern Islam gets its strength through liberal tolerance with its Western guilt built in – Islam preys upon such liberal weakness of the type that refuse to bomb Islamists if they use civilians as human shields

 

                I fear that (not thankfully in my life-time - I am soon to be 65) the Muslim world will take full advantage of the liberal nature of modern Europe's political class to subvert democracy (both internally and externally) and once more set its sights on the conquest of Europe. It will be, I regret, far more easily achievable than in the past because modern Europe lacks the same kind of ruthlessness it appreciated in the past to keep the Muslim advance at bay both externally and internally – the liberalism that plagues modern Europe may prove to be the nail in the coffin of European democracy – liberalism will bring about the death of tolerance it represents; because of liberalism and its adherence to any and all forms of tolerance ; it will eventually lead to its destruction.