‘Traditional voters,
who perhaps at times we took for granted but had nowhere else to go, are now
being offered an alternative by Ukip.
‘Our voters, if I can
still call them that, see Ukip [as] a party who are offering a vision and a
hope that things can be better.'
Rachel Reeves
RACHEL REEVES, like her professional colleagues,
understands little of what is happening with Labour's traditional working class
supporters; although she is right when she said we ignored them 'because they had nowhere else to go'.
This is a true statement reflecting the arrogance and contempt shown by the Labour
Party from Blair onwards, toward the very people who made the Labour Party, and
whose union subscription helped keep it solvent.
The
Labour Party began encouraging a new voting base - migrants. The white working
class saw what was happening, but the party made them fearful of speaking their
minds on immigration. They had bigoted sword of racism floating over their
heads ready to dropped the rules of political correctness were broken. Which
effectively meant keeping their collective mouths zipped. These were not
racists; for if they had been, they would have had an alternative to Labour
before the arrival of Ukip on the scene - the BNP.
Blair
and Brown knew that immigrants would be thankful to any party that allowed them
in and would remain loyal to them as they were making their way into British
society. Today in many northern cities the migrant population is
demographically changing the face of cities like Bradford, and more importantly
London in the south. The white working class were, before the arrival of Ukip
on the political stage, more or less told to like it or lump it.
Then
Tony Blair allowed hundreds of thousands of Poles, and Portuguese in from
Eastern Europe at a time when the Schengen Agreement (allowing for the free movement of people
within Europe) set aside a seven year period of adjustment for European nations
to prepare. Blair ignored this clause in the agreement and set about opening
our boarders to all and sundry throughout Europe; while expressing the belief
that only 13,000 would take advantage. Blair only thought of the electoral
advantages…and, as a politician, he was not an original in this respect.
But he saw only the political advantages to the Labour Party, and not the
disadvantages to the social infrastructure - to the NHS, criminality,
education, and housing shortages. All these areas are now being squeezed by an
increase in the country's population artificially created by Labour politicians who silenced with
charges of racism anyone who opposed them. So it is somewhat sanctimonious of
Rachel Reeves to bleat on about the party 'losing
its raison d'etre'
The Shadow Work and Pensions
Secretary cannot seek to regain the trust of its traditional working class
base. She and the Labour Party have sat back with arms folded, believing that
Ukip was damaging the Tory Party and believing that the white working class
were nothing more than a troop of trained chimpanzees wearing red rosettes; and
it was only within the emotional captivity of the Labour Party that they could
have any political purpose.
I DESPISE THE Labour Party for what they have done to this country. I am from a working class background. I failed my 11-plus and left school at fifteen; and from the age of eighteen in 1968, I have always voted Labour. Even for a brief period in the 1970s when I joined the British Communist Party…and what a mistake that was.
So when I say I despise the Labour Party. I am not speaking as one of its political enemies, but as one of its one-time supporters who in 1997 sat up all night to see Michael Portillo loose his parliamentary seat.
I supported Blair throughout his premiership from 1997 until the mentally unstable Brown helped remove him from office in 2007. So I cannot, with my background, be considered a Tory. I voted Ukip and will continue to do so, partly, because the white working class were abandoned by Labour and there is no chance of Labour winning them back and Rachel Reeves must understand this.
The white working class have always been small 'c' conservatives. A state of affairs those on the Left of the Labour Party always sought to change. But it this intransigent small 'c' conservative nature of the white working class that has appealed to them in supporting Ukip. Such intransigence has been there for centuries and long may it continue.
I DESPISE THE Labour Party for what they have done to this country. I am from a working class background. I failed my 11-plus and left school at fifteen; and from the age of eighteen in 1968, I have always voted Labour. Even for a brief period in the 1970s when I joined the British Communist Party…and what a mistake that was.
So when I say I despise the Labour Party. I am not speaking as one of its political enemies, but as one of its one-time supporters who in 1997 sat up all night to see Michael Portillo loose his parliamentary seat.
I supported Blair throughout his premiership from 1997 until the mentally unstable Brown helped remove him from office in 2007. So I cannot, with my background, be considered a Tory. I voted Ukip and will continue to do so, partly, because the white working class were abandoned by Labour and there is no chance of Labour winning them back and Rachel Reeves must understand this.
The white working class have always been small 'c' conservatives. A state of affairs those on the Left of the Labour Party always sought to change. But it this intransigent small 'c' conservative nature of the white working class that has appealed to them in supporting Ukip. Such intransigence has been there for centuries and long may it continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment