ALL OVER THE United Kingdom students attending our
finest universities are in thrall and captivated by the idea of censorship… the
very negation of what a university education within a democracy is meant to
promote. University is an intellectual institution that is supposed to comprise
of a dialectic between opposing ideas going back to the ancient Greeks; where
those that do not meet with the approval of the general consensus should be
allowed to speak, and be challenged intellectually; through debate of the kind
the University of Oxford and other such institutions have historically
promoted.
This
is no longer the case. In today's Daily
Telegraph, Tim Stanley reports of Ukip being stopped from debating at the
University of East Anglia (UEA). While he was himself invited to propose a motion at a University of
Oxford debate, was refused due to a feminist student protest.
The
debate was on abortion and it was threatened by student protest if it went
ahead. Oxford succumb. Brendan O'Neill was to have taken part in the debate
with Timothy Stanley. Brendan was to put forward the pro-choice argument
against Timothy Stanley who is pro-life. But both met with student opposition
that lead to the debate being cancelled.
But
why? Both sides of the argument were represented. The trouble was that the
debate was being orchestrated by men. Apparently, and according to those students
opposing the debate, any male should have no contribution to make, either for
or against abortion. Abortion is the monopoly of women, and no man should have,
either way, any part to play in such a debate.
On the issue of abortion it is
reprehensible that the best of our country's young minds, who are in attendance
at our premier university, can censor debate. It is a blasphemy that such
ignorance can manifest itself without opposition from the university
authorities…but it has happened.
IF THE SUBJECT of blocking an anti-abortion debate
were the only liberal-Leftist intellectual sin it would be a one off. But it is
not. The National Union of Students (NUS) have pressed their members into
censoring other areas of university debate covering the censorship of Israeli academics
on campus: or any criticism of gay marriage; as well as global warming: or for
that matter any other anti-liberal so-called 'progressive' politically correct
doctrine, which the students cannot face being challenged on.
It
is the NUS that has been given the power to restrict or even censor debate on
university campuses. The university authorities seem to kow-tow to the NUS. No
doubt, not because they fear their power (for they have none); but because they
sympathise with their views.
Our
universities of whatever calibre, are being run by the descendents of the same
liberal conquistadores who began their thrust into English culture in the early
1960s. Which is why they tolerate the infantilism of their students.
STUDENT NAIVETY is part and parcel of growing into
maturity. But never has such gullibility been so seriously entertained by the
academics who are meant to mould them. I can only conclude that liberal
political correctness is being sourced by liberal university academics, who
breed generation after generation of induced liberally minded students who arrive
at university already prepared by their parents and teacher's own liberal
influences, garnered during the 1960s and passed on to them by their parents
and grandparents.
These
so-called student academics are going to (judging from the subjects from which
they opine as students) will find
themselves teaching the next generation's children; either that or finding a
bolt hole in some part or other of the public sector where they can still find
a job for life. Those opposing a debate on abortion purely on grounds of
gender; or on the issue of gay marriage, as well as even denying the mere
presence of academics from Israel on campus; tells me that these students on
the whole, are studying the barren wastelands of social science, or the
humanities, from whose womb they will emerge to become, not only social
scientists but social workers and civil servants…or if the chosen path is a
humanities degree of some sort or other, they will probably find work at the
BBC or within some other part of the Left-leaning media.
Our universities seem to be manufacturing generation after generation of
a liberal mentality to take their place among the liberal Borg-collective that
now stifles liberty and, as with
communism constrains free speech. It is this future that such censorship will
unleash on future generations. This liberal auto-da-fé were careers can be destroyed
because of a politically incorrect comment on race, sexuality, or gender, by a
public figure – or an arrest authored by the tenets of multiculturalism on individuals
who are daily brought to book by the police for similar, 'hate crimes'.
THE MIDWITCH CUCKOOS have a liberal pallor to their
faces. These students are intellectually
anaemic. They cannot withstand any intellectual challenge to their pre-conceived politically correct assumptions. They are
weak of argument and will not tolerate a view that they believe undermines
their own liberal certainties. Debate is off bounds; and what is even worse, their
masters who oversee their education appear to be in coalition with them. Both Brendan O'Neill
and Timothy Stanley are seen as beyond the pale of these student's rigid and
foolish notions they regard as certainties, and therefore need not be given a
voice on the campus.
Here
we see liberalism taken to such extremes that it becomes the negation of the
tolerance that is supposed to be at the centre of the liberal cause. Such
extreme liberalism evolves into totalitarianism…as it did in the past with its flirtations
with Marxism.
To
close down all opposing argument is not a liberal concept but a totalitarian
one; and it seems that the Midwitch Cuckoos who trample upon the rights of
those who oppose them in debate, should never have been at university in the first
place - despite their grades.
No comments:
Post a Comment