ONE WEEK AGO TODAY, a fanatical killer vented his rage against the Norwegian government, by blowing up government buildings in Oslo and destroying the lives of 87 young people on Utoya island, who were, no doubt, a representative core of Norway’s future political leaders - which is why Anders Behring Brevik targeted them in the first place.
Breivik was not mad; he had been planning this outrage for eight years and, despite the BBC and other broadcasters, describing his 1500 page manifesto as a rant; his thoughts were wholly rational and contained opinions which are shared by many people who are not Right-Wing fanatics; and who would certainly not entertain the thought of massacring the innocents… Breivik fashion.
What may now happen because of this man’s nefarious actions will be to silence any voice that seeks to make an argument against immigration in general, and the threat that modern Islam poses to Europe in particular.
I fear there will now be a return to an earlier period when we were apprehensive about mentioning the subject of immigration in anything other than a supportive manner, for fear of the racist tag as well as prosecution if we stepped out of line and became “hate criminals”.
We paid a high price for our silence. For, from 1997 onwards immigrants were given a somewhat laissez-faire access to these shores. In all, some three million legal immigrants have made this small island their home. As for those who entered illegally, they may even run into many more. It appears that, the “illegal’s”, as they have been called, are in so great a number that they cannot be accounted for – and so it has been proposed that an amnesty should be introduced, making them all legal.
BREIVIK’S EXTREMISM must not be allowed to silence those who, like myself, believe that Muslims represent, like Breivik himself, an anti-democratic force that, given its chance, will try to impose its teachings upon the people of Europe.
Modern Islam (and here I speak not as a Christian, but an atheist) runs counter to modernism and is, in many respects, still at its medieval juncture. By this I mean that Islam has never subjected itself to the furnace of Reformation or Enlightenment. Its believers are still being held in check by the ancient teachings of the Koran, as well as the many misogynist traditions that are not even in the Koran.
If Islam was such a neutral and benign force, Turkey would have been given entry to the EU several years ago. Turkey is a democracy, as well as, geographically speaking, (at a stretch), part of Europe. But, despite this, our European leaders have little wish to grant Turkey’s 80 million Muslims immediate entry into the EU.
For, as our European leaders know all too well, Europe’s people would not accept such a development. This is probably because we in Europe already have some 16 million Muslims living among us and this already unsettles Europe’s people as they ponder the modern madness of Islam, as well as their political leader’s readiness to allow free entry into Europe of such a creed.
The largest religion in Norway is Islam. I did not know this until I heard it in a broadcast. At first I thought it was a mistake; but it was confirmed by my brother who was also present. I found it difficult to comprehend, unless a large part of Norway’s population were atheists.
I still have reservations about this statistic, but if true, it must have added to Breivik’s justification for his appalling act. For, as a Christian (especially a fundamentalist one), this gauge must have played its part in the rational that was to drive him to such destruction.
If you read into the final sentence above any kind of excuse for Breivik’s actions, then you will be disappointed. For this killer should never be allowed into free society again. But as things stand under Norwegian law, the maximum 21 year sentence could leave Breivik with the hope of once more tasting freedom before he dies - which would be a slap in the face for both his victims and their families.
I believe in capital punishment and Breivik is a prime candidate for the ultimate punishment. But things being as they are in Norway as well as the rest of Europe, Breivik may even be let out of prison before the middle of this century.
I BELIEVE THAT WHEN A RELIGION, any religion, takes over completely the mind of its followers to the point where they find death equated with martyrdom and, in the case of Islam, provides the martyr with enough virgins to help relieve his sexual frustration in perpetuity, then such a faith has no place within Western culture. Especially if such martyrdom has been earned through seeking the West’s destruction.
Modern Islam is still an antiquated faith; and it has no place in modern Europe. The last time when such a religion was present throughout European Christendom, it was under the authority of the Church of Rome and, like today’s Islam, it sought both its own ascendency, in the case of Rome through the Crusades and the total occupation of mankind’s souls. Which is what modern Islam seeks to achieve today.
Today’s Islam, like yesterday’s Roman Church, seeks its own ascendancy throughout Christendom (or the West) - just as Catholicism had once sought its own progress through the conquests of southern America.
THE CRUSADES WERE A POPISH ATTEMPT at the recovery of Jerusalem from Islamic control. Its many participants may have been devout Christians seeking this ancient city’s liberation from Muslim occupancy. But as we know as modern cynics; all was not as it seemed.
I only mention the crusades because Breivik was a fan of the Knights Templar and sought inspiration through them.
Why must such people like Breivik dabble in such romanticism in order to muster a case against such a foe? Modern Islam is no further forward than it was when it was founded in the 6th century. Today it is proud and boasts its lineage, and sees no reason to modernise its scriptures or displace the teachings of the Koran in order to accommodate themselves with the West.
On the contrary, modern Islam seeks only to salvage the infidels and make them Muslims. But such a momentous achievement can only be accomplished if the West itself allows sufficient numbers of Muslims to live as free citizens among them.
I do not suggest that every Muslim who lives in Europe is here as part of a religious attempt to take control of the continent. Obviously this is not the case. But, as the Islamists’ know all too well, before you can harvest a crop you must first of all plant the seed; and this is what has happened: not as a deliberate course of action by the Muslim world. But through the actions of European governments, including the UK who through the promotion of Multiculturalism allowed the infestation of such a modern religious imperialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment