Showing posts with label a tower of babel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label a tower of babel. Show all posts

Monday, March 5, 2012

Kindoki-yet another multicultural invite




IN THE PAST  WE have been introduced to genital mutilation, arranged marriages, ‘honour’ killings, and now witchcraft - to call it by its proper name, Kindoki. Kindoki is a form of witchcraft practiced in Central Africa which has been imported, like all of the other multicultural practices, into Britain.
            As with those other customs, our politicians were all to ready to plead ignorance of Kindoki until the case of 15-year-old Kirsty Bamu who was tortured to death by Magalie Bamu, and her boyfriend, Eric Bikubi.
            Over days spent being assaulted with a stick, a metal bar, hammer and chisel, Kirsty begged to die. He had 101 injuries inflicted upon him and he eventually did die, in agony through drowning in a bath.
            All of the above cultural customs are thankfully alien to Great Britain and her indigenous population’s way of life. But they are common within the cultures where they are practiced and have now been imported to the UK. The UK authorities, from the police and social services up to government level, must have been aware of such behaviour taking place in our society. They may plead ignorance, but it is my guess that, because of the white indigenous peoples anti immigration views; such behaviour had a blind eye turned to it in the past, when threats of racism would have been hurled at anyone who had suggested such behaviour among any of our minorities.
            Do you remember when we had our run in with Satanic Child Abuse on Orkney in the 1980s, which caused a great deal of hurt to the parents of children who were accused of abusing them through a satanic ritual and had them removed into care? It was the nearest we came to accusing British citizens of witchcraft. The Orkney Satanic Child Abuse that was supposed to have been prevalent was nothing more than the fantasies dreamt up by  social workers, based upon the latest theories emanating from the USA at the time. The behaviour of social services then was never of course comparable to little Kristy’s experience - but the thoughts going through the minds of social workers were as primitive as those who tortured Kirsty Bamu.
            The Orkney incident was just that – an aberration, a one off; based upon a theorem conjured up in the USA and trendily taken up by some parts of the UK’s social services. But when it comes to Kindoki, the practice is widespread in parts of Africa, and the Metropolitan Police have said that they have investigated 83 such ‘faith based’ child abuse cases in the last ten years.
            As we know the Met covers only London; but even here the Met can only investigate ‘reports’ of such activity; and what of the rest of the country?
            We remember of cause the murder of Victoria Climbié, the eight year  old girl from the Ivory Coast who was tortured and murdered by her guardians in 2000, which led to an enquiry under Lord Laming. Up until her death Victoria had come into contact with, police, social services, local authorities, the NHS, and the NSPCC. All of these bodies were criticised by Lord Laming and, as is the ritual in such enquiries, reforms were introduced, and the social service promised such failures would never reoccur.

KIRSTY BAMU’S case is probably the tip of the iceberg. As with genital mutilation, arranged marriages and ‘honour’ killings; the authorities still profess ignorance of the scale of what is happening around them. Only this week on Sky News, I was shocked to learn of some 10,000 illegal immigrants from India, living in what can only be described as a shanty town existence in London comparable to the third world. Illegal immigrants from India are being ’housed’ in shed-like extensions at the bottom of gardens belonging to various properties in London owned by people from the Indian community.
            These sheds have been built without planning permission and have been constructed to help pay the mortgages of the Indian property owners. Such bottom of the garden annexes are, to say the least, Spartan, as you would expect. For the Indian community is as prepared to exploit their own kind, as are the BNP the English.
            This black-grey rainbow aspect to multiculturalism is not something those in the establishment wishes the rest of us to see – for to do so would only confirm us in our distaste for multiculturalism. Those who fabricated this multicultural creed did so without any knowledge, except that of a peripheral view of the commonplace ‘evils’ of colonialism, which they used to assuage their guilt and allow multiculturalism to exist in Britain today.
            Our politicians, have, since the 1960s, never took full cognisance of the cultures they were about to unleash upon our shores; they only felt the guilt of colonialism. Which is why today we are enmeshed in a multicultural soup that has degraded our civilisation by, as multiculturalism does, levelling down the indigenous culture and equating it with all other cultures.
            Is it little wonder that parts of the white indigenous population feel themselves bereft of any kind of future?  Multiculturalism has overwhelmed the white British culture; and as such is it little wonder that the BNP and other fanatical Right-wing groups wish to make their mark?
            The Kirsty Bamu affair has turned the spotlight once more onto this issue of multiculturalism and, along with further examples of unacceptable customs and practices now and in the future, will show the white indigenous people of this country just how they have let down for generations by their political leaders.
            Our politicians have always understood the innate social conservatism that dominates all social classes in our society; yet they still proceeded with this multicultural nightmare – an outlandish imposition betraying the better instincts of the indigenous  population, who they, not for the first time have shown utter contempt for by their decisions.
              


           
             
            

Sunday, September 26, 2010

THE UN IS A BLASPHEMY OF ITS ORIGINAL PURPOSE

THE UN PANEL ON HUMAN RIGHTS HAS ACCUSED Israel of unacceptable levels of brutality, and of ‘wilful killing’, when the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) attacked a flotilla heading for Gaza last May in which nine ‘activists’ were killed. Is it little wonder that Israel refused to give evidence to the UN’s human rights panel when they managed to reach such a hideous conclusion? The video evidence was there in black and white for the world to see. As the IDF landed on the deck of the Mavi Marmara, they were beaten with iron bars by the so-called ‘peace activists’. There is even footage of one IDF member being thrown overboard.
            A few weeks ago the BBC’s Panorama programme carried out its own investigation into the events of last May. In the programme footage was provided where some 30 members of the Turkish ‘Islamist’ contingent on board began preparing for any expected assault by the IDF. They were seen using cutting gear to slice through the ships railings to provide themselves with weapons. Their intent from the moment (and probably before) the Mavi Marmara set sail, was to provoke an international incident that would embarrass Israel.
            There were many legitimate, if naive passengers, who had nothing to do with the Turkish Islamist’s aims and were genuinely shocked by what they were seeing unfold before them.
            The Islamists were, by the time of the IDF’s arrival, in virtual control of the Mavi Marmara and ready for action. Apart from the iron bars they had equipped themselves with, there was also an arsenal of knives and catapults in readiness.

I HAVE NO TIME FOR THE UN. I believe it to be both impotent and open (like most international bodies) to corruption. Its many attempts to end conflict by sending in a military force to bring peace has, since the Korean War, proved exceptionally poor. Neither British or American troops will wear that ridiculous blue beret that exemplifies their inadequacy.
            Did the UN Panel on Human Rights carry out an investigation into Srebrenica when thousands (not nine, like on the Mavi Marmara ) of Muslims were massacred without the protection from the UN’s Dutch contingent? How dare they even attempt an inquiry into the actions of a member nation, when the whole institution of the UN failed so many in Kosovo.
            The Israelis refused participation in this inquiry because they knew what the outcome would be. Why waste their breath when such an organisation can invite the likes of Libya onto the human rights committee of the UN.
            This wretched body is a disgrace. It presumes to be the spokesman for conflict resolution and peace. But we all know that it is governed by the permanent members whose votes are an extension of each of their nation’s foreign policy on any given issue.
            Any one of the permanent members can veto any proposal put forward by the central body. Yet we pour billions into this institution to continue its survival.

MOST OF THE MEMBER NATIONS are not fit or morally competent enough to either criticise or judge Israel, the one true democracy in the whole of the Middles East.
            How dare the likes Syria, Iran, Jordon, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Lebanon and Libya; (all members of this august body), so much as wag a disparaging  finger at the state of Israel after what they have inflicted on their own people over the years.
            These governments have managed, between them, to kill more of their own kind including the Palestinians themselves, than Israeli has ever managed to do since 1948.
            The United Nations, like its predecessor, the League of Nations, was the product of  well meaning idealism following two world wars. Its scope and visions were admirable. Many who fought in the last war (many of our post-war politicians in particular), saw its creation as our only hope for world peace in the future.
            However,  almost immediately following the Second World War,  the institution became divided into blocks between communism and the West. Human nature being what it is, and has been for thousands of years will eventually predominate; either in the form of self-interest, pragmatism, or outright villainy.
            Today the UN has been exposed to such a mix for the past 65 years and it now resembles a kind of Babel where the self-interest of countries, continents, and hemispheres dominate its proceedings.

ISAREL WILL NOT CONCERN herself at this institutions findings into the events of the Gaza flotilla - nobody else does. Israel will continue to look after her people’s interests as every serving member seeks to do. To be criticised by this body is becoming an embarrassment felt for the UN itself.
            There are too many members involved in this body that weaken its moral purpose and credibility. Members whose behaviour should have led to their departure. This is why the modern United Nations is indeed a blasphemy of its original purpose.