Showing posts with label oink. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oink. Show all posts

Saturday, September 10, 2011

SIR STUART BELL – BED BLOCKER EXTRAORDINAIRE


SIR STUART BELL’S MIDDLESBROUGH CONSTITUENCY is a prime example of a safe seat where Labour voters would vote for a chimpanzee to represent them if it wore a red rosette. Therefore they have little to complain about if their ennobled representative abuses the dispensation  given him by dyed in the wool Labour voters who’s votes are nothing more than barnacles, permanently attached to the Labour hull.
            As for Sir Stuart, he can afford to ride out any controversy, knowing that his position can only be placed under threat by his constituency party or Labour’s NEC. Both these options seem unlikely, unless the Labour voters of Middlesbrough decide at the ballot box to end their MP’s 28 year reign.
            He is being criticised for having never held a constituency surgery in 14 years - but is, however, available by phone: although his local newspaper, the Middlesbrough Gazette had called his office 100 times over the summer without reply. At least after claiming £85,000 in “staff costs” according to the Daily Mail – part of which, £35,000, goes every year to his wife who manages his “office”, you would have thought an exchange of a few pleasantries with the editor of his local newspaper would be the least he might be prepared to do.
            Sir Stuart Bell received his knighthood in 2004, followed in 2006 by being appointed a Chevalier of the Légion d'honneur; France’s highest honour; which was presented to him by President Chirac - who is now, by the way, under investigation for corruption while mayor of Paris.
            Sir Stuart also seemed to play the part of parliamentary shop steward during the expenses scandal that degraded even further the popular reputation of our political class. He did much to diminish his own reputation by appearing to blame the parliamentary overseers for the many noses dipped deeply in the trough.
            For his reputation was formidable. For instance, after being promoted by Neil Kinnock in 1984 to the frontbench as a spokesman on Northern Ireland; he resigned after the Cleveland child abuse scandal broke. For the next two years he took on Cleveland’s social services in support of Cleveland’s children; and this, if nothing else, earned him is knighthood. He thus became one of the few to receive the honour who can proudly boast that it was well merited; and not a political reward for services rendered.

BUT WHAT THE CASE OF Sir Stuart Bell, and now, it seems, the former MP for Luton South, Margaret Moran proves; is that the “safe seat” is the modern equivalence of the old Rotten Boroughs. For whoever stands in such seats need never fear the electorate, but need only to pay close attention and fawn over, like Dickens’s Uriah Heap, their constituency parties; who will remain loyal long after the cell doors have been slammed shut.
            There should be no safe constituency in this country. Each and every member of our parliament should feel insecure. They should not  be allowed to countenance the good life at the tax payer’s expense; they should not feel that they are in an invulnerable position freed from the electorate’s will. If the electorate will not change their ways, then, demographically speaking, the ways must be changed for them if they wish to see their confidence in our political class restored. It is no use complaining about the likes of Sir Stuart Bell or Margaret Moran, if you are not prepared, voluntarily, as voters, to put an end to it yourselves.
            We are still, in many areas, a class bound country with class loyalties that will not be shaken by any one individual’s behaviour, providing that individual represents the party they have, for generations, given their loyalty too.
            It is the people of Middlesbrough that need to change. Their loyalty is to a party and not an individual. As long as Labour returns an MP for Middlesbrough, it matters little about character or criminality short of murder; and it matters little to the party unless they detect a backlash among loyal Labour voters in Middlesbrough. Then, and only then, will the party they have been pre-programmed genetically to support change its ways.
            A safe-seat can become an excuse for laziness, as it appears Sir Stuart Bell’s has become. In such circumstance it neither befits the current representative, or his party. He has become sluggish and languorous, about his duties to the people of Middlesbrough.  
            To have never consulted with his constituents in 14 years, can have only been accomplished by a politician who knows that he sits, democratically at least, almost immovable from his position as an MP: an MP who knows that when he is eventually driven out of office; it will be to the House of Lords, and given further opportunity for making money.

TODAY OUR POLITICIANS, AS A CLASS, are venal and third rate. They seek out rewards for their families quite legitimately under Green Book rules, and have little or no serious background for being politicians.
            Their minds are third rate; they have little knowledge of this island’s history other than what they were taught at school; and as far as the Left is concerned, the ordure of every page presented to them to study naturally finds only the utmost contempt.
            There must be an overhaul of this country’s voting demographics. In America party allegiances are not so profound as they are in this country. If a political leader in America, fighting for his party’s acceptance as a presidential candidate cannot garner enough support, he or she is quickly disposed of; because power is the first need of any party.
            Sir Stuart Bell is not alone within the political parties. All of the parties have safe-constituencies which face little opposition at election times. The House of Commons needs reform. It needs a reduction in the numbers of its members by a third, and as a result, a redrawing of constituency boundaries.
            Sir Stuart Bell will be offered the Lords by Ed Milliband before the next election, and the offer will be gratefully accepted by this latter day Rip Van Winkle.
            There he will sit out his remaining days, dining well; until he passes away on the red benches, and is carried finally from the mother of all parliaments by several bewigged parliamentary officers wearing black tights. At last the noble Lord will be free from his persecutors and the spite of an ungrateful nation.
            

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

POLITICS OF THE PORK BARREL


There he stood, announcing his intention to leave office if the Liberal Democrats could only bring themselves to join the Le Grande (left-wing) Alliance with Labour and a few nationalists who will expect the English tax payer to cough up to seal the deal - the Welsh Nationalist have already said they expect an extra £300 million for the principality. How much Scottish Nationalists will demand remains to be seen.

It was an outrageous display by Gordon Brown that, had the roles been reversed and it had been David Cameron standing there saying what our disreputable 'leader' had said; I cannot imagine our Guardianistas being so sanguine as they now expect those 10 million voters who voted for the Conservatives to be.
If Glegg jumps into bed with this lot, I believe his party will pay a heavy price. He said he wanted stable government working for the national interest. He will get this if he comes to some kind of agreement with David Cameron - playing the PR card is not part of the national interest, even if Polly Toynbee thinks it is.

What the last five days have shown is exactly what can be expected from the Lib Dem's system of PR. It is as if we have seen a vision of the future, and if what we have seen is pleasing to the eye, then I would prefer politicians shouting at each other across the floor of the house - at least we know what they are saying.
Under PR, party manifestos will become as phony as a six pound note. What will happen, through the type of 'negotiations' we are currently witnessing, is that promises made to the electorate will be torn up as the politicians hide themselves away and decide on our behalf how we should be governed and what they believe (through their nefarious dealings) is best for us in terms of the laws we will have to obey.

It will be government by cabal; nothing will be out in the open for us, the voters, to form an opinion about. It will be the great and the good standing over us like later day Bourbons, deciding on our behalf what policies from what manifestos they deem are in our interests.

At least with the first past the post system the manifestos kept their integrity, even if, in some cases, the politicians lost theirs when they tried to ignore manifesto pledges once in government.

Nick Clegg should either join with the Tories or let David Cameron form a minority government, and, if he is the honest politician he says he is, then vote against the Queens Speech and have another election, which will happen anyway. This would be a far more honourable road to take, than joining a bunch of electorally discredited politicians in order to maneuver you party into an alliance with a David Milliband led Labour Party.
What the past five days should have taught us, is that a hung parliament has been like living in the twilight zone, and this is exactly what we have to look forward to with Clegg's PR. Those 'progressives' who are pleading for their right to govern to be written in PR stone, are now trying to convince us that the electorate voted consciously for a hung parliament, so that such an alliance could come about.

We should know sometime today what the king maker has decided; we all sit in awe of his powers, waiting for him to pronounce his decision - God help us all.