Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Jihadi John – a Muslim icon?

MOHAMMED EMWAZI, aka 'Jihadi John', has either been described as the perfect employee by a company he once worked for in Kuwait; or a loner who kept himself to himself who was bullied at school. While a former ISIS militant described him as being 'cold and detached'. There are those who say that this amoral sociopathic personality was the creation of MI5. In other words MI5 were the Dr Frankenstein to the Emwazi monster. It was, according to such cretins, MI5 who created the sociopathic collector of human heads. Without MI5 persecution, this poor and gentle individual, would today be the perfect UK citizen, probably working as a BBC social affairs correspondent.
                
                Well, this latter (anti-MI5) caricature has been painted by a so-called 'human rights' outfit known as Cage; who gave a press conference after 'Jihadi Johns' real identity was found and announced to the world. Since then Emwazi's background has been churned over by the media. Apparently his father, Jasem Emwazi was accused of colluding with Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait. Jasem has been described as a 'bully and collaborator with Saddam' – as each day passes more facts and speculation emerges about Emwazi.
                
                 The press conference last Thursday was presented by three representatives of Cage including one John Rees who acted as the moderator during the conference. Rees was once a former leading activist of the Socialist Workers' Party, and also a national officer of the Stop the War Coalition, as well as now being a presenter on the Islam Channel.
                
                 Cage has charity status and as such is entitled to appeal for contributions from businesses and charitable trusts. Cage has been successful in its attempt to seek financial support. The Anita Roddick Foundation has so far bequeathed £120,000. While the Rowntree Charitable Trust has been duped into handing over £305,000 over a six-year period – this is a case of exemplary liberal naivety.
                
                 Cage described this young psychopath as an 'extremely kind' and 'beautiful young man'; Its research director Asim Qureshi who was the focal  point of the press conference regarding answering the presses questions has been outed by no less a figure than Guido who came up with a video made in 2006 of Qureshi addressing a rally outside of the US Embassy in London, from which I quote: "We have no fear. So when we see the example of our brothers and sisters fighting in Chechnya, Iraq. Palestine, Kashmir, Afghanistan, then we know where the example lies. When we see Hezbollah defeating the armies of Israel we know what the solution is and where the victory lies. We know that it is incumbent upon all of us  to support the Jihad of our brothers and sisters in these countries when they are facing the oppression of the west. Allahu akbar! Allahu akbar!"
                
                 Cage should have its charitable status removed - if for no lesser reason than that Qureshi lives in a  £500,000 house in suburban Surrey with his partner. But will this happen? I doubt it because Qureshi is a Muslim and the liberal hegemony does not like upsetting Muslims. So Cage will continue. Whether the naive simpletons at  the Anita Roddick Foundation or the Rowntree Charitable Trust, remove their financial support or not is of course up to them – but history is littered with useful idiots prepared to support extremists, even those as vile as Emwazi.

IT IS THE LEFT who have always been attracted to particularly Left -wing dictatorships, and their sadistic unpleasantries in the past, and whose fascination continues to this day. The term 'useful idiots' was first used by Vladimir Illyich Lenin, to describe those British Left-wing, usually bourgeois, Fabian intellectuals such as George Bernard Shaw, the Webs and H G Wells, who supported the Bolshevik revolution and wrote propaganda pieces exemplifying  everything good in socialism with reference to Soviet Bolshevism.
                
                Today the socialist Left, having been disillusioned by the failure of the Marxian dialectic incorporated in historical Materialism, have turned to another means of destroying their bitter enemy - the capitalist system. They are now fully prepared to sell their souls to the Islamist devil via a kind of Faustian pact with Islam to bring down the hated capitalist system; even if it destroys their socialist world view. Their logic being; that if Marxist socialism is to go down – then we Marxists will try to take capitalism down with us – their very own nuclear scenario.
                
                Anyone or anything therefore, that opposes such a system will be welcomed by the modern socialist Left – even if they associate themselves with a culture that isolate, and give in bondage women to whomsoever their Muslim parents wish to, through an arranged marriage; and if the arrangement is opposed by the women – then an arranged killing can be provided.
                
                Another aspect of Muslim culture which the Left ignores is the Muslim's fascination with female genital mutilation (FGM). Hundreds of thousands of such procedures have been carried out in this country over the decades: only to be ignored for so long by the liberal hegemony.
                
                The liking of (Muslim) Pakistanis for young indigenous white female under-age children entrapped into abuse, including rape,  went ignored by the PC authorities, like the police and social services in Rochdale, Rotherham, and Oxford (among other precincts in other towns and cities). Even today the practice continues. Such abuse of young children by Muslims still goes ignored – the liberalista fear the power of Islam within the UK and will mollify any outrage committed by any ethnic member of the multicultural community committed against a white indigenous individual.

JOHN REES, who sat as a moderator during the Cage press conference is not a one-off isolated Left-wing socialist, who takes his hatred for the capitalist system to such lengths that he is prepared to sell his political soul to any buyer who he sees promises an end to capitalism – even if the Caliphate he believes will come about, would be far more cruel and destructive than the capitalist system he has spent the whole of his wretched and embittered life, opposing.
                
                Mohammed Emwazi, is a terrorist. He has earned that title by his behaviour – and only HIS BEHAVIOUR. Nothing else matters to the families of the individuals from whom he separated heads from bodies. Emwazi's past does not matter; however much the liberalarti (I refer in particular to the Guardian) try to give it  some significance.
                
                MI5 never played any part in how Emwazi turned out – if anything, they should have  kept him in isolation. But the control orders that would have allowed this to happen were opposed by Nick Clegg and the Guardian, and were done away with as part of a coalition compromise.     
                
                Both the hard and soft Left[1], including the Liberal Democrats, have between them managed over time to become almost vassal-like servants in their attitude to the 2.5 million Muslims they have irresponsibly set to live among us over the decades. The Muslims, if they only knew it, have more power over our politicians than the white indigenous population have ever had.
                
                Mohammed Emwazi, will, I foresee, in three decades from now, be considered a martyr by the ever growing Muslim population within many towns and cities within the UK; which in many, particularly northern towns and cities, will have attained for themselves the majority over the white indigenous population: and the politicians from the three main parties will compromise accordingly; firstly on sharia law in order to get their votes.
                
                In 30-years time Emwazi will be seen as a kind of what?  I suggest a folk hero by the dominance of many Muslim communities in our towns and cities who both Labour and Tory will rely upon in order to become the government – and who knows; perhaps there will be a statue commissioned, of Emwazi posing in some Muslim dominated northern city; replacing a once British hero.
                Once the demographics change so will the attitude of our politicians, as Tony Blair found when he opened the floodgates to mass migration, particularly from Eastern Europe. He hoped to replace the white working class; and replace them with thankful Catholic Poles to begin with – he and his wife are, after all, Catholics themselves.

MOHAMMED EMWAZI'S presence in the UK relied upon (as all Muslims did) liberal colonial guilt. His family came to the UK and were immediately given a council house to live in by the liberal hegemony that has reigned over the decades from the 1960s onward, including today. It apparently was not enough, even for a new start.
                
                Emwazi is a cruel and vindictive pawn of ISIS. It matters not what drove him to do what he has done and will continue to do. He must be stopped and Cage must be allowed to wither on the vine of unwanted charitable donation. Cage describes itself as a human rights organisation; but it appears that it only considers the rights of the be-headers rather than their victims.
               
               
               

               
               








[1] By hard and soft Left, I refer to those within the two main parties.

No comments: