'DISPRPORTIONATE' is the Left's way of seeking to
justify Hamas's terrorist aggression toward Israeli civilians. Nick Clegg has
been first off the mark to accuse Israel of a disproportionate response to the
1500 missiles arbitrarily fired into Israel without any consideration for
Israeli civilian deaths over the past ten days.
War
is, and can never be proportionate. If you are attacked you reply with whatever
force is available to you. It can be argued that the allied bombing of German
cities was disproportionate, in terms of those killed, to the bombs dropped on
English cities by the Germans – and it was thankfully this disproportionality
that helped keep our democracy safe.
Churchill
believed that if a nation is attacked then war becomes total, and you do
whatever you can to defeat your aggressor and bring the war to a close as
quickly as possible. Disproportionality is a liberal construct. What they mean
in the case of Israel is that the Israelis should shut down Iron Dome to make
the contest more equal – a kind of equality, not under law, but under war.
If
those 1500 indiscriminately targeted Hamas missiles had been allowed through to
do their worse, and kill on a parity with the bombs being dropped on Gaza;
then, no doubt, Nick Clegg and the thousands of pro-Palestinians existing
within the liberal compass, would have been satisfied…or would they?
Hamas,
unlike Israel, have no aircraft to bomb Israel with. They also have no tanks,
or underground shelters to protect their civilians. So the logic of the Clegg
disproportionality argument is that Israel should abandon all these military
devices that give them a disproportionate military advantage over Hamas – or,
on the other hand, Israel should supply Hamas with their own Iron Dome system
to make things more equitable. Would that help Mr Clegg?
I have
noticed that whenever Hamas starts such an aggression (and they always start
it) the liberals remain silent; silent that is until Israel responds. Then the
disproportionality argument is deployed, and the BBC's porno-journalists cannot
get their cameras into Gaza fast enough to show blood curdling images of
Palestinian women and children on stretchers and wrapped in bandages with a BBC
film crew by their bedside: which Hamas are all too willing to use for their
own propaganda purposes.
The
BBC are pro-Palestinian, and there has been no attempt at impartiality. The
corporation itself commissioned a report into accusations of such bias known as
the Balen Report which was commissioned in 2006 and named after Malcolm Balen,
the BBC's senior editorial advisor which to this day has never been released;
while the BBC has spent some £300,000 of British taxpayer's money on legal fees
to keep it out of the public arena.
HAMAS USES its citizens as shields, hoping that
Israel will make a mistake to far in its targeting, and kills enough civilian
Palestinians to cause such an outrage in the Western media, that Washington, the
EU, and the UN, will pressure Netanyahu into another retreat until the next
time, because there will be a next time: by which time the Hamas missiles will
be more sophisticated; sophisticated enough to reach even further, and become more
accurate; and even out-sophisticate what Israel can produce in response.
This
conflict between Israel and the Palestinians is not about the equal division of
territory; but the annihilation of the Jewish state and its people. Hamas
openly acknowledges this. They do not believe in any kind of 'two state
solution', only in ridding the land that is now Israel of the Jews.
Stop
and think for one moment. If Militant Islamic groups like ISIS are fully
prepared to slaughter fellow Muslims in Iraq. What then do you think would
happen to the Jews of Israel if they were ever to become overwhelmed by their
many enemies throughout the Arab world - not only among Hamas?
Nick
Clegg is intellectually corrupt; but he is not alone among his kind. They are
all besotted with Palestinian 'victimhood', and their hatred of Israel borders
on anti-Semitism, disguised as anti-Zionism.
THE UN, America, Europe, and the UK; all regard
Hamas as a terrorist organisation. Objectively speaking it cannot be denied.
One dictionary definitions is; "The calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence)against civilians in order to attain ggoals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this isdone through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear." This definition fits perfectly into the
UN's and the West's definition; thus does Hamas qualify.
But
I would like to add to that definition by including the following. The
calculated use of a civilian population as human shields; the calculated use of
civilian homes to store missiles in; the calculated use of civilian homes from
which hundreds of tunnels are begun in order to enter Israel and terrorise
civilians; the calculated use of hospitals as hiding places for terrorist
leaders; and finally, the calculated use of a willing and supportive Western
media for propaganda purposes – Yet, the likes of Nick Clegg still witter on
about disproportionality.
According
to the Israeli press; since Israel's incursion began 13 tunnels and 3,000
rockets have been discovered; which has led Benjamin Netanyahu to warn that the
incursion may become broader in its ambition to destroy the tunnels. Meanwhile the JTA[1]
has reported the condemnation by the United Nations Relief and Work Agency of
Hamas, following the discovery of 20 rockets in one of its schools on the Gaza
Strip.
Proportionality
is for those delicate blooms who live safe lives in their Islington quarters who
can comment from afar without the fear of a missile tapping on their front
door. These bourgeoisie liberals are Hamas's useful idiots who hold influence
in the media and are biased in favour of a terrorist organisation.
Israelis will hopefully defy their Western
critics and continue to try and rid their land of the threat from missiles and
tunnel incursions into Israel like the one attempted last week; which, if had
proved successful, would lead the deaths of countless Jewish civilians of every
gender and age.
Hamas
must be defeated and those so-called Western friends of Israel had better brace
their spines and openly give unconditional support for Israel as presumably
they would any democratic country defying a terrorist organisation - Its over to you Obama.
No comments:
Post a Comment