Blunkett and Straw enter the confessional

ONE OF THE architects of uninhibited immigration into the UK under the last Labour government, has given us his opinion on the continuing onslaught that in January promises to be the most controversial yet -  so David Blunkett, who was Home Secretary between 8^th June 2001 - 15^th December 2004, has decided to speak out.

           

            Many of his Sheffield constituents, he tells us, have set up street patrols to combat the anti-social behaviour of the city's Roma 'community'. There are some 200,000 Roma from eastern Europe currently resident in the UK, the largest in Europe; and as we know (and is probably why Blunkett is now speaking out) that next January our boarders will be opened up to Romania and Bulgaria under the  EU's Schengen agreement that our last government signed us up to.

           

            Having played a part in the disaster, that is slowly strangling the NHS (although leaders from the three main parties are loath to make the connection) and undermining our education system; as well decreasing available housing[1], Mr Blunkett tells us that we[2] have every right to grumble; but we must not 'stir up hate'.

           

           This man belonged to a government that created this problem, which has given grounds to the British people to do more than grumble; grumble is something you do when the weather is not to your liking - nature is impregnable, so all that is left to do on a bad weather day, is to grumble.

            

            Immigration is not a force of nature however, but a force wilfully and deliberately created by politicians: and now one of them seeks to effectively tell us to 'suck it up' and not 'stir up hate'. Blunkett must know that flooding the country with immigrants[3], as Tony Blair did, should  never have been tolerated if those  creations of socialism such as the NHS were to remain in tack.

THOSE OF US who did speak out against the tsunami of humanity that was about to flood our shores in 2004, were dismissed by the likes of Blunkett and his New Labour 'stakeholders'[4]  as racists, and by this means debate on the subject was swiftly brought to an end.

            

            David Blunkett, who, like every other member of the last Labour government, should either draw in their political claws when it comes to the subject of immigration, or have them clipped by the electorate.

            

            The one time home secretary tells us that grumbling is okay, but anything else will '… set a fire alight, you came from Bradford, you saw it – nobody gained from that.’ He referenced cities like Bradford, Burnley, and Oldham, which in the summer of 2001 whites were pitted against Asians, and 200 arrests were made.

            

            Yet, despite this, Labour signed the Schengen Agreement; and all Blunkett can tell us, is that grumbling is acceptable and not a hate crime, and should be encouraged or understood[5] as we often do with the weather. In Bradford today, it boasts a minority white indigenous population, as does Leicester. It either suggests white flight or the unlimited growth (created by politicians) of the Asian community.

            

            City after city is succumbing[6], yet all Blunkett allows us to do in the way opposition…is to grumble. His liberal conscience is not prepared to sanction anything more, and if anything more is pursued, he uses his escape clause - his liberal conscience.

            

            David Blunkett and his fellow ministers at the time, are what Ed Milliband had in mind when he apologised for Labour's record on immigration after the last election, in order to make the party electable before the next. The only problem was, of course, is that Ed was part of that same government - and as a socialist, is presumably a believer in internationalism and the brotherhood of man. So he would have, in private at least, supported the swamping that occurred under the last Labour government.

BUT THE COALITION should not be let off the hook either. For what have they have done  has only continued the progress of mass immigration[7], particularly, but not exclusively, from eastern Europe. Our political class are overseeing the demise of both British and English culture; and like David Blunkett, are asking us to have a good grumble, which they feel we are owed - but anything more would be considered racist.

            Any attempt  by the white indigenous population to protect their cultural roots (that exceeds a mere grumble) from extinction by a generation of politicians educated into multiculturalism at the finest schools and universities in the country, are now, presumably, to be treated as racist.

           

            David Blunkett has effectively nothing to say on the subject of immigration. His advice is a mere attempt to pour balm over the crises he and his party created. There will hopefully be opposition to what is happening; and it will not come from racists like the BNP, but from people living in communities, similar to my own, whose  seaside towns have been subjected to influxes of immigrants, to be housed  in bay-windowed boarding houses that once housed holiday makers from the rest of the UK during the summer months.

IF INTERNECINE conflict erupts between divergent cultures, as Mr Blunkett suggests could happen following the events in 2001. Then it will be on his head, as well as Jack Straw's, who has today admitted that his governments policy on immigration was a 'spectacular mistake'

           

            Mr Straw admits his part in lifting the transitional arrangements under the Schengen Agreement, which allowed for a transitional period of seven years to be granted to member states before implementation; in order to allow those states to prepare for the influx.

            

            But Tony Blair decided that this was not required and so lifted those transitional arrangements. The boast at the time was that only 15,000[8] East Europeans would wish to visit our shores. What actually happened in the following 10 years, was the appearance of one million Poles on our shores to come to live and work - where was this in any Labour manifesto, and why were the British people never given a say in such a dangerous piece of social engineering by Tony Blair and his government.

            

            Not a day seems to go without some elder 'statesmen' from the Labour Party entering the public confessional on this issue - an issue, the consequences of which, will traumatise this nation and will damage, most of all, those institutions that Labour feels most proud about being part of creating; institutions like the welfare state, the NHS, state education, and social housing. This is the irony. The Labour party unleashed immigration and in the process helped bring about the demise of these socialist projects.

           

           

           

---

[1] To such an extent that those in social housing are being told to rent out a bedroom to a total stranger or lose part of their housing benefit

[2] The white indigenous population

[3] By 2030  country this will have an additional 10 million citizens, which represents another city the size of London

[4] 'Comrade' had of course, by the time of Blair, become outmoded as an Old Labour cliché. In fact it was an Old Labour form of introduction from the 1960's when the virus of Marxism entered the veins of Labour's activists.

[5] I have since learnt that Mr Blunkett's citizen patrols in Sheffield are made of members of the Asian community, and makes me wonder whether Blunkett would have so sanguine had these foot soldiers had been indigenous whites.

[6] Even London itself is succumbing. White flight from the city has made our capital the multicultural capital of the world, soon to be minus the UK's white indigenous population that once represented the majority.

[7] Real solutions negated by anti-immigrant rhetoric and little else

[8] Straw, writing in his local press, has said that such forecasts were 'worthless'