Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Tony Blair is hated at home – rightly so.

HAS THERE EVER been a more shocking piece of social engineering in a democracy? The plan was to change the demographics of the United Kingdom; not through any invasion of the type used by the likes of the Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Normans or Nazis; but by a prime minister opening up his country's borders long before he even had to in order to strengthen his party's appeal – or rather his own appeal as the deliverer of New Labour.
                
                 We all knew from Peter Mandelson that the Labour Government under Tony Blair opened up our borders without going along with the EU's bedding in period of seven years before it was needed to come into effect. Mandelson has admitted that his puppet master wanted to change Labours traditional electorate from within the working class (which was shrinking) while those that were left were deemed antiquated and hostile to New Labour. Blair also sought to rub the noses of the Tories into the dirt. He hoped that the Conservative Party in the country would rebel; and they did, but only by turning to Ukip who gained four million votes at the last general election.
                
                 Blair opened our country's borders willingly and purposely; believing the country needed fresh blood to champion the cause of his New Labour project. He decided that the British working class had to be replaced, and, to him there could be no better way of keeping his project alive and flourishing than by the importation of replacements. And 685,000 of the replacements came from Poland. Blair's attempt at social engineering will have serious consequences. The joke he wished to play upon the Tory Party will come back to haunt him. He will be seen in the future as a counterfeit statesman of little consequence by history. He will find his mark in the annals, however, more through his misjudgements than through his achievements - which apart from winning three general elections  has very little to commend himself to history. Thatcher also served three terms and saved the country; while Blair ruined its social fabric through his social engineering.
                
                  My brother suggested that the Poles were given preference because Cheri Blair is a Catholic; and the introduction over time by Polish Catholics into the UK would strengthen the UK Catholic population to the benefit, not only of the Catholic Church in the UK; but also to Cheri Blair and her husband; the latter in terms of grateful Poles keeping his project alive.
                 
                  I thought at the time, that my brother was being somewhat in need of a more rational perspective, to put it kindly. However, I am prepared to accept that such a prospect was considered by the Blair's, not as a prime objective; but as an additional benefit to their misconceived and perilous restructuring of the UK's demographics to what he thought would be to New Labour's benefit. Blair is an egoist par excellence: he considers himself almost celestial outside of his country's borders. In all parts of the world (especially the money making parts) Tony Blair is treated, especially in the USA, as a money spinner on the speech-making circuit.
                
                  By falling in line with George Bush junior after 9/11; Blair established himself in the most financially lucrative country in the Western world. He addressed Congress with tumultuous applause. Once he engaged the American public as he did in his speech to the American Congress on that fateful occasion; his celebrity was guaranteed internationally, and he joined the lucrative speech-making circuit commanding six zero sums for a 40 minute speech; after he was forced from office by the ever mordant presence of Gordon Brown in his political life. 

TONY BLAIR has done great harm to this country. He is hated as much at home as he is revered among the wealthy abroad; he consorts with tyrants, and his lawyer wife defends such tyrants using human rights law.  He has harvested millions from such associates abroad; and whatever happens to this country the Blair's will be safe and affluent. They care little about the indigenous population; if their wages are driven down by imports of cheap Labour; if their schools, hospitals, and homes are put in what may turn out to be an unrecoverable position brought about by Blair's Merkle-like invitation to two and a half million migrants to come swamp the system; then so be it.
                
                 The Blair's will not be put out by any of this because they can buy their son and daughter's education and healthcare; and a home in some out of the way cull de sac or crescent hidden by trees or other such foliage from the indigenous proles, where they need never see or experience the social landscape Tony Blair has created – except of course if they need a Polish plumber or Philippine maid to cater for Cheri's needs.
                
                 The Blair's remind me of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos. The Blair's are as hated in their country as were the Marcos' in theirs. If the remain supporters wish to win in June, then one of the first things they must do is to clamp shut Tony Blair's mouth. While, as much as I loathe the very sight of the man I voted for on three occasions; I hope he ignores such advice and attend his ego.
                
                 Social engineering has never had a happy history. It was tried by Stalin, Mao, and Hitler among many others over time. Driven by ideology and idealism, both Communism and Nazism turned their creations into a nightmare for those who lived under them: and so it will prove with Tony Blair's experiment in the genre: multiculturalism is the latest ideology that blueprints Blair's social engineering and it will have the same consequences, (and not only for the white indigenous, but also for the post-war Asian and Afro-Caribbean population) as all other forms of political idealism has.
                
                Blair is no friend of the UK. He cares little for his nation; he cares little for its indigenous culture, and he certainly cares little for any rational argument that opposes his vision. He would never tolerate criticism or advice from more practised seniors in the civil service if their advice contradicted the project. He thinks himself immutable, like a Grecian god. His word is the word and he expects it to be obeyed.  Each electoral victory added to his sense of demagogic status. Like all celebrities (which after all he really is) he floated in the ether of fame – loved abroad and hated at home.
               



No comments: